so if a company has been doing very well for years and years and is in fact a market leader all this time, is going through a bad patch or loses its leadership, then it should be rejected and not touched ever again?
In the case of nokia, the leadership was lost due to some technology changes and it can be argued at this stage, that while leadership has been lost, nokia still has potential to upgrade technologically and at some stage even come up something greater.
Or, it could just make phones that use android like all the others..atleast nokia had original designs , while samsung has copied everyone's technologies merely because it was an OEM supplier and manufacturer and it had access to blueprints.