Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Posted: 04/Dec/2009 at 8:36pm
Originally posted by atulbull
Not to impugn Pimco's integrity (which I consider the
highest), but this view is convenient for that firm. Its business is
mainly in fixed income. As the economy strengthens--whether a little or
a lot--it is likely that long-term interest rates will rise. That will
make Pimco's bond portfolios go down in value. There's not much that
bond managers can do in a long bear market for bonds and still look
smart. If they go to cash, even with excellent timing, they get no big
hero's reward of the sort equity managers can get.
Take note: Pimco, a division of Allianz
(
AZ -
news
-
people
), is getting into the equity business right now. Watch what its managers do, not what they say.
Emcor Group (EME, 26) is in an ugly field: industrial
construction and services like electrical installation and heating and
air-conditioning for commercial, industrial and government customers
(in America, no less). Still, it does relatively well from its base in
Norwalk, Conn. It sells at only 13 times the forecast for depressed
2009 earnings and at 30% of annual revenue. At this price you are
paying maybe 4 times 2011 earnings.
The argument against PIMCO is relevant and very much probable.
We need to check EMCOR and see how different their model is from our own MEP companies (Blue Star and Voltas)!
The low market cap to sales and the relatively high PE (in comparison to market cap to sales) do indicate a very low margin. But if the difference between Fy09 and Fy11 PE is around 3 times then earnings are expected to explode in the next two years. Any idea on the triggers for this stock since they operate in acountry where urban infrastructure has been built- almost.
At1.6bn US$ this is cheap
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:EME
On the subject this was probably a Buffett company also in the same business.
http://www.google.com/finance?cid=8852723
Edited by basant - 04/Dec/2009 at 8:43pm
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 02/Jan/2010 at 6:26pm
A Grateful Dead Year
ken fisher ,
12.31.09.
2009 was a textbook case of how stock markets are supposed to react to big bear markets and recessions.
As the Grateful Dead used to sing, "what a long, strange trip it's
been." When I started in this industry, 38 years ago, classy firms like
Disney and DuPont sold at 40 times earnings. These were
"one decision" stocks--supposedly so reliable that you could make a
decision to buy them and just put them away in a safe deposit box
forever. This era of glamour stock investing was followed by a decade
of negative returns. And then, just as most Americans had given up on
stocks, there began an almost unparalleled 18-year run for stocks.
By
2000 it was another "new era," and "clicks" not "bricks" were
everything. Profits were supposedly irrelevant. Since then stock
returns have been negative.
And now? This should be a great time to own stocks. But we forget
these long-term lessons and think about the recent past. And so now the
investing public sees a future of dismal returns, just as it did in the
mid-1970s and early 1980s.
My 2008 bullishness was wrong. Pretty
much everything I'd ever learned about how markets should work didn't.
I wasn't alone. That year's chaos contributed to the early 2009 view of
a new global Great Depression and a new set of rules tied to the "lost
decade."
That dismal outlook arrived just in time for a 2009 that
was a textbook case of how markets are supposed to react to big bear
markets and recessions. My Feb. 16 column, "Anticipate the V," worked
almost flawlessly. I'm betting 2010 will work out the way markets
usually do in the second year after a big bear market, with returns not
as high as 2009's but well above average. My 2010 New Year's Eve is a
lampshade-on-head gleeful appreciation of 2009 plus an anxious
anticipation of a year where stocks like these should reward nicely:
Enersis
(
ENI -
news
-
people
) (ENI, 21)
is an electricity generator and distributor based in Chile but reaching
into Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. Cheaper than developed
country utilities by any metric but with a past and future growth rate
near 20%, it enjoys an operating margin (Ebitda to revenues) of 32%,
triple the industry norm. It sells at less than nine times my estimate
of 2010 earnings. You can anticipate 2010 dividends of better than 5%
of today's stock price.
Another Chilean firm, LAN Airlines
(
LFL -
news
-
people
) (LFL, 16),
connects countries like Argentina, Ecuador and Peru with Chile,
America, Europe and the South Pacific. It's an emerging markets growth
stock at a value price. Eighty-four-passenger planes also carrying
cargo (boosting efficiency relative to competition) plus 11 dedicated
cargo planes are currently seeing high single- and low double-digit
increases in capacity and traffic. It sells at one times revenue and
ten times my estimate of 2010 earnings.
A highly speculative airline I find compelling is China Eastern Airlines (CEA, 36),
an airline based in Shanghai that is China's third largest, with about
a fifth of the country's traffic. CEA has lost money for years. The
recession made matters worse. I see a smoother ride ahead as a rising
air current lifts all these planes. Revenue should grow 25%, almost
eliminating losses in 2010. With that the stock should excel. It sells
at 30% of trailing sales.
The Taiwanese firm United Microelectronics (UMC, 3.4)
is the world's second-largest contract semiconductor maker. Skeptics
prefer the glamour and larger market share of Taiwan Semiconductor. In
the current strong semiconductor upturn, as all firms rebound briskly,
the difference between the two will be less than expected, meaning that
the stock should do well. Revenues are rocketing right now. United is
selling for 24 times consensus 2010 earnings, but I'd bet those
earnings come in closer to 25 cents a share than to the 14 cents
expected.
Have employee staffing firms had a tough time? Well, yes. Manpower
(
MAN -
news
-
people
)'s (MAN, 56)
half-billion-dollar profit in 2007 melted to $50 million (on revenue of
$16 billion) in 2009. It should make more than $150 million in 2010 as
the global economy gains steam and revenue rises above $20 billion. In
the early stages of the recovery, employers will use temporary workers
rather than commit to full-timers who are expensive to lay off.
Spanning 80 countries (albeit with an overweight to France), Manpower
is well positioned to take advantage of this phenomenon through its
400,000-plus customers. The recession increased its labor quantity and
quality naturally. It sells at 30% of revenue and 17 times the $3.25
per share I think it can earn in 2010.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 23/Jan/2010 at 6:37pm
Good News
Ken Fisher,
01.15.10
This should be a great time to own stocks. But we forget long-term lessons and think about the recent past.
When I started in this industry, 38 years ago, firms like Disney and DuPont
(
DD -
news
-
people
)
sold at 40 times earnings. These were "one decision" stocks--supposedly
so reliable that you could buy them and just put them away in a safe
deposit box forever. This era of glamour stock investing was followed
by a decade of negative returns. And then, just as most Americans had
given up on stocks, there began an almost unparalleled 18-year run for
stocks. By 2000 it was another "new era," and "clicks," not "bricks,"
were everything. Profits were supposedly irrelevant. Since then stock
returns have been negative. And now? This should be a great time to own
stocks. But we forget these long-term lessons and think about the
recent past. And so now the investing public sees a future of dismal
returns.
My 2008 bullishness was wrong. That year's chaos
contributed to the early 2009 view of a new global Great Depression.
That gloomy outlook arrived just in time for a 2009 that was a textbook
case of how markets are supposed to react to big bear markets and
recessions. I'm betting 2010 will work out the way things usually do in
the second year after a big bear market, with returns not as high as
2009's but well above average. Stocks like these should reward nicely:
Enersis
(
ENI -
news
-
people
) (ENI, 21)
is an electricity generator and distributor based in Chile but reaching
into Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Peru. Cheaper than
developed-country utilities by any metric but with a past and future
growth rate near 20%, it enjoys an operating margin (Ebitda to
revenues) of 32%, triple the industry norm. Another Chilean firm, LAN Airlines (LFL, 16),
connects countries like Argentina, Ecuador and Peru with Chile, the
U.S., Europe and the South Pacific. It's an emerging markets growth
stock at a value price.
Based in Shanghai, China Eastern Airlines (CEA, 36)
is China's third-largest airline. CEA has lost money for years. The
recession made matters worse. I see a smoother ride ahead as a rising
air current lifts all planes. Revenue should grow 25%.
Taiwan's United Microelectronics (UMC, 3.4)
is the world's second-largest contract semiconductor maker. Skeptics
prefer the larger market share of Taiwan Semiconductor. In the current
semiconductor upturn, as all firms rebound, the difference between the
two will be less than expected, meaning that the stock should do well.
Revenues are rocketing right now.
Have employee staffing firms had a tough time? Well, yes. Manpower
(
MAN -
news
-
people
)'s (MAN, 56)
half-billion-dollar profit in 2007 melted to $50 million (on revenue of
$16 billion) in 2009. It should make more than $150 million in 2010 as
the global economy gains steam and revenue rises above $20 billion. In
the early stages of the recovery employers will use temporary workers
rather than commit to full-timers. Spanning 80 countries, Manpower is
well positioned to take advantage of this phenomenon.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 23/Jan/2010 at 6:40pm
Recovery, Part Two
Ken Fisher,
01.21.10
Don't succumb to the pessimism of disbelief. The second year after a bear market is a fine time to own stocks.
It's report-card time--a FORBES-mandated retrospective on my 11
columns published in 2009. This year the assignment is easy. My picks
did well. During 2009 I made 65 recommendations (including six
repeats). If you had put an equal sum into each you would be up 44.4%.
If you had put the same money on the same dates into the S&P 500
you would have gained only 20.9%. The FORBES statistics department,
moreover, docked my picks a 1% trading cost but didn't dock the index.
Neither return figure includes dividends, which are about one
percentage point higher on my stocks.
In the 14 years that we
have been going through this exercise, I have lagged the S&P 500
only three times. My average gain over those 14 years has been 9.9%
(and that's in effect a partly invested return, since each calendar
year's buying is spread over 12 months); the corresponding market
average has been 4.7%.
My best 2009 pick was Braskem (BAK, 17),
Brazil's petrochemical giant, up 216% from its first recommendation in
the Apr. 27 column (released Apr. 8) to a year-end price of $16.40.
Hang on to it. My worst was Chinese solar cell maker Suntech (STP, 17)
on July 13. It lost 9%. I still like it. You should keep these two, and
I will carry them over as 2010 buys. My third carryover: Canada's Magna International
(
MGA -
news
-
people
) (MGA, 50),
the world's third-largest and most product-diversified auto parts
maker, up 57%. You shouldn't necessarily unload the other 56 stocks
(that depends on your tax situation), but I am not choosing to reenter
them in the 2010 derby.
We've entered a period that I call the
"pessimism of disbelief." The public's mood is to notice anything bad
(like 10% unemployment) while dismissing anything good (like narrowing
credit spreads) as not credible. Most investors, having failed to
anticipate the recent bull market, now fear the risk of a big fall. It
is presumed that monetary and fiscal stimulus will not work or will
give rise to inflation, impossible debt burdens and socialism. Health
care legislation is an Obamanation, and so on. This is the "wall of
worry" bull markets love to climb. I think pessimism will decrease in
2010, helping stocks.
Despite all you may fear, today's negatives
are lesser ones than we've often faced. The history of second years
after a big bear market that is followed by a positive year like 2009
is stunningly, consistently, overwhelmingly positive. Don't succumb to
the pessimism of disbelief. Buy stocks like these:
Vivo (VIV, 30) is Brazil's largest cellular
operator, with a third of the market--50 million subscribers, all using
Vivo-branded wireless sets. This plays directly into the growth of
Brazil's emerging middle class. Vivo should keep growing materially
faster than the industry, yet sells at 80% of 2010 revenue and 20 times
the $600 million I think it will earn.
Ireland's CRH (CRH, 26) is a diversified
building-materials firm that amazingly remained profitable throughout
2008 and 2009, albeit with clipped earnings. This $26 billion (sales)
firm operates in 35 nations, making concrete, cement, asphalt, flat
glass, roofing supplies and more. Its sales base is diversified among
residential, nonresidential and infrastructure markets. With a history
of above-average growth and superior profit margins, CRH is well
positioned as recovery extends overseas. Its price is low in relation
to industry averages: You are buying at 55% of annual sales, five times
cash flow and 12 times trailing earnings. The recent earnings are
depressed. You are paying maybe nine times 2010 earnings.
Korea's LG Display (LPL, 17) is
the world's second-largest manufacturer of liquid crystal displays,
after Samsung. These lcds are used in televisions, computers and cell
phones assembled and sold by other firms. LG Display (once wholly owned
by LG Corp., the former Lucky Goldstar) was initially listed in 2004.
It's still 35% owned by LG, a conglomerate best known here as a maker
of cell phones. LG Display sells for 80% of its $14 billion of revenue,
1.4 times book value, five times cash flow and ten times my estimate of
2010 earnings.
Lubrizol
(
LZ -
news
-
people
) (LZ, 77)
of Wickliffe, Ohio makes a wide array of speciality chemicals used in
engine oils, transmission fluids, compressor lubricants, coatings and
inks. Most of its sales go to oil refineries and basic industry. I
expect several years of 20% sales growth, which should make the stock,
seemingly expensive at 55 times trailing earnings, reasonably priced at
12 times the earnings plausibly achievable in 2011.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 31/Mar/2010 at 9:02pm
The Golden Question
Ken Fisher,
02.25.10
Don't buy a stagnant piece of metal when you could
own growth. Central European Media and Starwood Hotels are going to
grow.
Trying to preserve her
youth, Diane de Poitiers, mistress of French King Henry II, died from
drinking gold. Today's world is choking on it. My firm's investment
counselors get more questions like "What about gold?" than on any other
single topic. Overseas investors are particularly smitten.
They
shouldn't be. In the 433 months since trading freely following 1973's
demise of the Bretton Woods exchange-rate system, gold has had a 7.1%
average annual return, achieved solely from six relatively brief spikes.
These bull markets lasted for 66 months, or 15% of the time. The rest
of the time gold suffered a 3.6% average annual decline. In this regard
gold is unlike stocks and bonds, which are up more often than they're
down.
I answer the gold question with a question: How good are you at
timing markets? If you aren't an exquisite timer, or very lucky, gold
isn't a great place to aim your money. It's like throwing darts at a
board that has six losing spots to every winning one.
And if you
are that good at timing, why waste your efforts on gold? You could go in
and out of other commodities or the stock market to great effect. You
of course would have been buying oil in January 2007 and selling it in
July 2008. You would have loaded up on emerging-markets stocks at the
beginning of 2009 and made 75% for the year. That was three times more
than gold went up last year (24.8%), even as a frenzy of buying caused
the main ETF for gold to add 11.5 million ounces to its hoard.
If you can do all that timing you sure don't need advice from me.
Gold has had a bull run since November 2008 that might have peaked in
November 2009 at $1,214 an ounce. Can it continue and how far will it
go? Opinions are everywhere, and I have no clue.
I do have clues
about the world economy. The global expansion that began last spring in
less-developed nations is building steam everywhere. The things now
causing great fear, like the questionable solvency of Greece, are just
speed bumps en route to economic growth and higher profits. Having had a
terrible bear market we now can reasonably expect several good stock
market years. The volatility along the way creates additional buying
opportunities. Here are some worth seizing now.
Advertising
expenditures rise faster than national income as less-developed nations
catch up. One way to benefit is through Central
European Media Enterprises
(
CETV
-
news
-
people
) (CETV, 30), a creator and operator of
television stations that from its base in the Czech Republic reaches
seven eastern European countries and 90 million viewers. Crunched by the
recession, it now operates just below break-even. But growth and margin
expansion will fix that. You're paying ten times my forecast of 2011
earnings.
Telecom
Italia
(
TI
-
news
-
people
) (TI.A., 12) is Italy's dominant phone provider, spanning
fixed lines, cellular and Internet. At home it's a cash cow. Abroad it's
growing, with a huge cellular operation in South America and 3 million
Internet customers in Europe outside Italy. It's too cheap at 40% of
annual revenue, 60% of book value and six times my estimate of 2010
earnings. Its trailing dividend yield is 5.8%.
If you prefer a
purer play in growth markets, try Korea's SK
Telecom
(
SKM
-
news
-
people
) (SKM, 17), which at 23 million cellular subscribers has
half Korea's growing market as well as operations in Vietnam, Mongolia
and China. It sells at nine times 2010 earnings and 90% of revenue.
I expect Mexico to bounce
back from recession and with it its largest steelmaker, Simec
(
SIM
-
news
-
people
) (SIM, 7). Mexico will see revivals in both auto sales and
construction. This company's $1.2 billion market value is 46.7 times
trailing depressed earnings yet less than eight times my estimate of
2011 earnings.
As the global economy picks up, hotel usage will,
too. Starwood
Hotels & Resorts
(
HOT
-
news
-
people
) (HOT, 37) operates or franchises 285,000 rooms in 95
countries under brands like Westin and St. Regis. Its Sheraton hotels
are running at half capacity. Top-line growth in the next two years will
do great wonders for the bottom line. The multiple of 51 against
trailing earnings scares folks off. Its 10 p/e on my estimate of 2011
earnings at today's price won't.
Finally, always own a few stocks that might not excel in a hot market
but will hold up in a cool one. Australia's container and packaging
giant Amcor (AMCRY, 21) fits the bill. Even if the global economy
isn't as vibrant in 2011 as I foresee, Amcor should do fine. It sells
at 12 times likely 2010 earnings and 60% of annual revenue. It has a
4.9% trailing dividend yield.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 31/Mar/2010 at 9:04pm
Bull Market, Chapter Two
Ken Fisher,
03.25.10
I like what I see: improving fundamentals plus
skepticism: the classic ingredients of the second phase of bull markets.
It's a year since the bull market began, and I remain firmly bullish.
I'm often wrongly called a permabull. I'm not one. In 25 years of
FORBES columns I turned bearish for three extended periods: in 1987, in
1990 and between 2000 and 2002. Yes, I completely missed foreseeing the
2008 bear market. But that doesn't make me a permabull.
When in
doubt I am biased toward owning stocks. Stocks rise more often than not.
Since bear markets are always followed by bull markets--which is a
basic rule some investors seem unable to accept--it seemed to me basic
to be bullish once the 2008 bear market was well under way. One year
into the current bull market I like what I see: globally improving
fundamentals plus strong societal skepticism. Snarky, cranky sentiment
and better fundamentals are the classic ingredients of the second phase
of bull markets.
Economic numbers globally and almost consistently keep coming in up
and better than expected, while being largely dismissed in terms of
significance. In part this is because the fastest recoveries from the
recession are happening in the 25% of global GDP found in emerging
markets countries. Maybe it's unnerving that China and Brazil are
leading us. Americans are way too U.S.-focused.
My Feb. 8 column
cited the "pessimism of disbelief," the tendency to see all news as bad,
or, if good, as something likely to morph into something bad. (Typical
formulation: Stimulus efforts either won't work or will cause
inflation.) You can see this pessimism in mutual fund flows: For three
years there has been a migration into bond funds--mostly into government
bonds for safety--just in time for long-term U.S. government bond funds
to return a --17.5% in 2009. That's fear.
For more on market
sentiment, visit market blogs anywhere. The skepticism is wise-guy
thick. Anyone posts something positive and they get pounded by the
wiseacres. I love it. This is the wall of worry bull markets classically
climb. So be bullish while the sentiment's sour--and keep buying good
companies at reasonable prices, like these:
Brazil's Fibria
Celulose (FBR, 22), the old Votorantim Cellulose, at
first glance seems neither cheap nor positioned to dominate. But it's
about to merge with Brazil's Aracruz to become the global leader in
hardwood pulp, with 24% of the market. This is the raw ingredient for
high-end paper and ultrasoft tissue. The merger implies future pricing
power in a market where prices are already firming as inventories
shrink. Fibria sells at 20 times projected 2010 earnings and at 90% of
book value. Not very cheap. But I'll bet that price will turn out to be 8
times 2011 earnings.
Coal is China's energy source. I recommended
Yanzhou Coal Mining (YZC, 22) in the July 13
column at 12. It still has upside. With great reserves in advantageous
locations, this low-cost 35-million-ton-per-year (and growing) producer
should enjoy fatter profits margins over the next several years. It
sells at 14 times likely 2010 earnings.
Today Big Brother should
be watching. Israel's Nice-Systems (NICE, 31) makes
voice loggers that record, archive and monitor communications from
multiple sources. These complex systems can detect changes in emotion
among voices and are sold to 24,000 customers ranging from
multinationals to Australia's Parliament to police and fire departments.
For a steady grower this company is too cheap at 17 times 2010 earnings
and 1.8 times book value.
New Zealand will prosper in part on its
proximity to emerging markets. This prosperity will rub off on the
dominant phone company, Telecom New Zealand (NZT, 7),
which is too cheap at ten times 2010 earnings and 80% of annual
revenue. You're likely to get an 8% dividend yield over the next year on
today's price.
Weight Watchers (WTW, 25) runs weight-loss
cheerleading sessions and licenses its name to vendors of
moderate-calorie prepared foods. Is it hard to envision why the stock
should rise and folks should shrink their wallets to diet now? Just see
it as a classic long-term, moderate-growth consumer stock--just when
stocks of expensive brand-name products are doing well. It is, after
all, the brand in its field. As consumer income bounces back,
people don't have to choose between this and indulgences: They might
choose both. Weight loss makes them feel better about indulging. This
stock was for a very long time steadily over $35 and often up to $45. It
will get back there. At today's price it goes for nine times likely
2010 earnings and yields 2.8%.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 27/Apr/2010 at 5:52pm
Those Bullish Spreads
Ken Fisher,
04.23.10
The global yield curve is steeper than it has been
in half a century. That's a sign of strengthening economies.
If you've read me you know I'm bullish, and you know why: Sentiment
is snarky, skeptical and pessimistic at a time emerging-markets-led
global growth is stronger than folks think. But there are many reasons
to expect a good return on stocks in 2010. Here are five you likely
haven't heard elsewhere.
The GDP-weighted global yield curve
(spread between long-term and short-term government interest rates) is
steeper than it has been since the 1960s. This is bullish because it
reflects future eagerness to lend. Banks borrow short-term money and
lend long term. A wider spread means fatter bank gross operating profit
margins on future loans, hence increased future lending. This has
historically been a great market-timing tool.
Further, the spread between ten-year Treasury yields and the average
cost of credit default swaps has narrowed to zero. (Two years ago CDs
rates were 0.75 percentage points above T note yields.) That means the
economy is keyed to expansion and credit demand more than recession and
bankruptcy risk. That's bullish.
Item three: In March junk bond
offerings hit a record level of $37.8 billion. Low-quality midsize firms
couldn't borrow a year ago. Now they can. Small businesses will be
next. Bears used to complain that low-quality firms can't borrow. Now
the argument is that all this borrowing is risky. They can't have it
both ways. They have succumbed to the pessimism of disbelief, which I
discussed last month. When you hear pessimism taken to such excess, you
know you should be bullish.
Item four: The purchasing manager
index, a widely watched leading economic indicator for America, is
mostly ignored overseas. It applies everywhere and is wildly expansive
in emerging markets. Those markets (India, China and Brazil, among
others) make up more of global GDP than America does.
Last point:
People are misreading the financial crisis in Greece. What they take as a
source of despair should in fact be cause for reassurance. Greece, as
messed up as it is, can still borrow. The pessimists are forgetting that
as recently as 20 years ago responsible borrowers like Germany were
paying as much to borrow money as shaky borrowers like Greece and Italy
are paying now. Fear of a false factor is always bullish.
Five
reasons! I get only so much space here or I would prattle off another
15. Look for more in future columns.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 25/May/2010 at 8:37pm
Mountains and Molehills
Ken Fisher,
05.20.10
Utilities in emerging markets often combine low
risk and growth. Take a look at Brazil's Companhia de Saneamento Basico.
It's simply astounding, after all we've seen in recent decades, that
anyone pays attention to credit ratings put out by the officially
sanctioned rating agencies. As September's annual report (mandated by a
2006 credit rating "reform" law) from the Securities & Exchange
Commission documents at great length, there is no competition or
improvement in this oligopoly. The big agencies have a way of warning of
trouble spots (like Enron) only after the trouble is evident or of
adding to a panic (like Greece's) that is already beyond any rational
basis.
In other words, Moody's and Standard & Poor's compound
investors' worst sins, including the tendency to make a mountain out of a
molehill. The fact that investors exaggerate the importance of economic
negatives is a theme that recurs throughout my 25 years of column
writing for forbes. And if you want more on that subject let me put in a
plug for the recently published The Making of a Market Guru,
by Aaron Anderson, a survey of my FORBES columns.
Until the bailout on May 9 the pessimists had us persuaded that
Greece was on the verge of liquidation and Spain was close behind. They
forgot that between 1989 and 1994 Greece, which accounted for the same
share of the world's economic output that it does today, had not a
drachma of long-term debt. It had to finance itself solely on short-term
debt--and its interest payments, as a fraction of GDP, were more than
twice what they are now.
Panics pass. This one will, too. Stop
thinking about short-term market jitters and more about long-term
investing. Own stocks like these:
Companhia de Saneamento Basico (SBS, 39) is a
Brazilian water- and sewage-treatment firm. Utilities in emerging
markets often combine low risk and growth, and this is an example. With
25 million customers, this is the world's third-largest utility dealing
with water and should maintain growth of about 10% a year. It's cheap at
one times revenue, 70% of book value and six times likely 2010
earnings.
Canada's Corus Entertainment (CJR, 20)
was spun off in 1999 from Shaw Communications (SJR, which I recommended
Nov. 2) and is still controlled by Shaw founder J.R. Shaw. Corus is one
of Canada's largest media companies, spanning radio, TV stations, TV
content production and book publishing. It has recently lost money,
scaring investors, but should turn a profit this year and deliver
earnings close to $2.50 a share in 2011. The stock will move ahead of
the earnings.
I'll bet Canada's Methanex
(
MEOH
-
news
-
people
) (MEOH, 23) gets taken over before this
business cycle ends. As the world's largest, dominant and low-cost
producer of methyl alcohol, this $2.1 billion (market capitalization)
specialist would fit neatly into many larger chemical firms. It also
runs the world's largest fleet of methanol tankers. It follows my theme
that this is a good time for basic materials stocks. It sells at eight
times 2010 earnings with a 2.7% dividend yield.
MGM Mirage (MGM, 15) is more a roll
of the dice than most stocks I recommend, but I like its consumer
discretionary exposure. Why now? Gambling hasn't recovered to its
prerecession level. But stocks in this sector will price this year on
expectations for consumer behavior in 2011 and 2012. MGM is the largest
Las Vegas gaming operator, with three of the best properties: the
Bellagio, the MGM Grand and Mandalay Bay. It's in lesser gambling
regions in the U.S. and in Macau. It's currently losing money and has
$13 billion of long-term debt, scaring investors off. But it's cheap at
only one times revenue and will look cheap in relation to earnings when
earnings return.
Don't let the BP disaster scare you away from
oilfield services. I like two companies: Halliburton
(
HAL
-
news
-
people
) (HAL, 29) and Baker Hughes (BHI,
47), respectively the sector's second- and third-largest
firms. Between them they cover the entire spectrum globally and
complement each other nicely. Directional drilling, bits, submersible
pumps, pressure pumping, oilfield chemicals (which is about to be huge,
as shale wells get frakked)--they do it all. There is no valid
alternative in the near future to fossil fuels. Considering their future
and strengths, these two providers are reasonably priced at 14 times
this year's expected earnings.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum