You want to maximize your chances of getting
good results from stock picking? I have a system, and it boils down to
focusing on just three big questions...... ....
Example: Most investors believe that years
when the market is trading at a high multiple of its collective
earnings are bad years in which to invest and low-P/E market years are
good times. This popular belief is contradicted by the evidence, as I
have outlined in earlier columns. Yes, there are some high-P/E years
that turned out to be disasters (2000 and 2001, for example). But there
are just as many occasions when buying into a high-P/E market was the
right thing to do, for example in 1932, 1998 and 2003.
So when you see folks freaked out by high-P/E
markets, you can bet against them. You know something they don't know.
You can invest knowing that the market P/E is irrelevant. (And it
should be.)
......
Interesting, given the views expressed elsewhere suggesting other otherwise
Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Posted: 16/Aug/2009 at 8:55am
The idea of looking at the Pe should be linked to whether we are fairly through into a bull market or emerging from a bear case. For instance in 2k and 2007 we were a few years with the bull whereas in 1932, 2003 etc we were emerging from a bear case. A market emerging from a bear case is expected to neutralize the high Pe with increased earnings not so much in the other case.
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
The idea of looking at the Pe should be linked to whether we are fairly through into a bull market or emerging from a bear case. For instance in 2k and 2007 we were a few years with the bull whereas in 1932, 2003 etc we were emerging from a bear case. A market emerging from a bear case is expected to neutralize the high Pe with increased earnings not so much in the other case.
Makes perfect sense but I have one doubt. A company that retains its high P/E in a bear market must be special or one for which earnings (& stock price) didn't really collapse in the bear market.
Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
Posted: 16/Aug/2009 at 9:43am
Hind Lever is one such stock but it did not get expensive with the market so from a best performer a few months back it has become a dud. But on the other hand there are companies like Nestle and Marico which have satisfied shareholders.
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 13/Sep/2009 at 7:43pm
Buy Into Fossil Fuels
Ken Fisher,
09.02.09, 06:00 PM EDT Forbes Magazine dated September 21, 2009
Energy-hungry consumers around the globe will be
demanding fossil fuels. So be overweight in energy stocks--at least 12%
of your equity.
Rich Karlgaard's recent column on energy and the Waxman-Markey
carbon trading bill should be required reading for every high school
and college kid. They should have to read it three times. Adults should
have to prove they've read it before being allowed to vote. The column
outlined the harsh reality of renewable energy. In this country 89% of
electricity comes from three fuel sources: coal, natural gas and
nuclear fission. That fraction won't change dramatically in the next
decade. If you want your air conditioner to work in 2014, you'd better
hope that more fossil fuel plants get built.
I'm riding down the
road in a friend's electric Tesla Roadster. Sounds clean, doesn't it?
But we are burning 49% coal, 21% natural gas, 20% nuclear and little
else. Wind power? Zip! How will we run Teslas without fossil fuel? We
won't. How will emerging markets, with a combined gdp already bigger
than America's, grow without more fossil fuel? They won't.
Nuclear power might provide for our needs (and, if you believe in
the global warming theory, protect our atmosphere). If the French can
get 70% of their electric energy from nuclear safely and cleanly, then
we can. But will we? Politically, it will be difficult. Many of the
same people screaming that fossil fuel creates global warming are also
adamantly against adding clean nuclear power. There are a lot of
nuclear reactor applications pending in the U.S., but the permits will
be few, and slow in coming.
That situation, and the fact that
other energy-hungry countries will also be demanding fossil fuels,
tells me you should be overweight in energy stocks. That means at least
12% of your equity in energy companies, and most of that in companies
with a fossil fuel emphasis. Here's a hefty handful I like now.
I've
recommended one energy stock in each of the last three months. But
among U.S. firms producing petroleum and natural gas, four stand out: Apache
(
APA -
news
-
people
) (APA, 85), Chevron
(
CVX -
news
-
people
) (CVX, 70), Hess
(
HES -
news
-
people
) (HES, 51) and Marathon Oil
(
MRO -
news
-
people
) (MRO, 31).
I like Apache's growth potential overseas and in natural gas, Chevron's
mass and class, Hess' portfolio and projects, and Marathon's
over-the-top cheapness. These are all high-quality firms with balance
sheets and cash flows (in the sense of net income plus depreciation)
quite able to withstand the volatility in energy prices.
Among my foreign favorites is Repsol YPF (REP, 24),
a Spanish firm with a lot of assets in the New World. It has 2.3
billion oil- equivalent barrels of proven reserves, or about two
barrels per share, and has daily production of a million barrels. A
common criticism of Repsol is that much of its operations are in
politically unstable parts of Latin America such as Argentina. I'm not
as bothered as most investors by the politics of that continent. With
increased wealth comes a bigger middle class and more political
stability. That shift will help boost valuations. Repsol sells at book
value, 40% of annual revenue and ten times likely 2009 earnings. It has
a 4.8% dividend yield.
Even more disdained, and for the same reason, is the Colombian firm Ecopetrol (EC, 26).
The mere thought of Colombia causes investors to envision drugs and
death. But our government backs, and will continue to back, Colombia,
and the Colombian government owns 90% of Ecopetrol. It produces about
half what Repsol does but is more reserve rich per dollar of revenue,
with 1.4 billion barrels. At ten times 2009 earnings and with a 4.8%
dividend yield, it qualifies as a value investment.
I recommended Cameron International
(
CMRN.OB -
news
-
people
) (CAM, 35)
last September at $43 as the market blew apart and rolled it over into
my 2009 picks at 21. My original pick should pay off over time.
Operating in 100 countries, Cameron makes specialty oilfield gear, much
of it the kind of equipment (like blowout preventers and undersea
machinery) that is hard to find elsewhere. The early 2009 collapse in
oil prices hurt, but Cameron will be at the center of increased fossil
fuel demand. It sells at 18 times depressed 2009 earnings but only 10
times my 2010 earnings estimate.
The French firm CGG Veritas (CGV, 21)
collects and manages geophysical data (images of plausible drilling
spots) and data on discovered oil reservoirs. If demand for fossil fuel
grows, so will demand grow for CGG Veritas' services. This is an
innovative technology firm as much as an energy-services firm. Yet it
sells at 80% of book value, 80% of its $3.7 billion of annual revenue
and 12 times my estimate of 2009 earnings.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 25/Oct/2009 at 8:53pm
Viva The V
Ken Fisher,
10.15.09, 11:20 PM EDT Forbes Magazine dated November 02, 2009
If history repeats, the current V recovery is far from over. Expect another 20%-to-25% gain by January.
Viva the vrrooom! We're in the midst of a really big and steep V. As
detailed in my Feb. 16 column, "Anticipate the V" (and updated in my
May 25 column, "Blink and You'll Miss It"),
big bear markets are almost always followed by big bull markets in a
V-shape pattern. The steeper the descent, the steeper the ascent.
Most
investors give too much credence to the theory that prices are
rational; they presume that a market collapse must have been justified
by serious economic trouble. As a result they presume that we can't
have a big bull run after prices crash. History proves that presumption
to be false.
This time the V is almost perfect--so far. As I write, the MSCI
All-Country World index is exactly where it was on Sept. 29, 2008. From
there to the Mar. 9 bottom was five months and ten days. From the
bottom up to here is not quite seven months, a slightly lopsided V.
Note:
The V works for the whole world stock market, not necessarily every
country's. Any one market, including America's, can take on an odd
shape. Always think globally first.
The fundamental force behind
every V is always that the last phase of a bear market is driven
completely by imploding panicky sentiment rather than the fundamentals
people think they're thinking about. The sentiment implosion is a
societal, psychological depressed-spring effect that makes the market
bounce back as quickly and as far as it went down.
All the while
people fret about sucker rallies and expected pullbacks, the V keeps
its shape. I described that sequence for the 1930s in my May 25 column.
Now take a look at the bear market bottom on Dec. 6, 1974. A year and
five months later the stock market was almost exactly where it had been
a year and five months before Dec. 6.
If history repeats, the current V recovery is far from over. If it
keeps up for another six to nine months the global stock market will be
20% to 25% higher by Jan.1, 2010. We had a long (16 months) and deep
(down 60%) bear market. Now we're getting a big, long bull run. Stay
with it, with stocks like these.
Brazil's TAM
(
TAM -
news
-
people
) (TAM, 13)
has 50% of Brazil's airline market. In developed markets airline stocks
are dogs. In emerging markets they're growth stocks. tam should grow
about 15% a year yet sells at only eight times my estimate of 2009
earnings, and at only 30% of annual revenue and 2.4 times cash flow (in
the sense of net income plus depreciation).
Net Serviços de Comunicação
(
NETC -
news
-
people
) (NETC, 12)
is Brazil's largest pay-TV provider, with 3 million customers. It also
delivers Internet access and phone services. Net will grow with
Brazil--and then some. It sells at 15 times my estimate of 2009
earnings.
With similar numbers of customers Canadian Shaw Communications
(
SJR -
news
-
people
) (SJR, 18)
has a diversified communications business with cable tv, Internet,
phone and satellite services. It should grow 12% a year and at 16 times
earnings is relatively cheap for a company with low-risk growth. You
get a 4.4% dividend yield.
Huaneng Power International
(
HNP -
news
-
people
) (HNP, 26)
is China's largest nongovernmental electricity generator. It has 40
gigawatts of generating capacity in 17 wholly owned power plants, plus
output from partially owned plants, and more power on the way. Power is
central to China's growth and Huaneng is central to China's power. At
12 times 2009 earnings, 50% of annual revenue and 90% of book value
it's cheap. Expect earnings growth of 15% a year.
Wynn Resorts
(
WYNN -
news
-
people
) (WYNN, 66)
is among the world's biggest gaming destinations. In 2006 it earned
$629 million on $1.4 billion in revenue. Now earnings are crunched for
obvious recessionary reasons. In 2010 it should have well over $3
billion in revenue and by 2011 should be earning over $1.5 billion. But
the company's market capitalization is $8 billion. You are, in other
words, paying less than 6 times plausible 2011 earnings.
Grandma
and Grandpa have the dough. With the recession ending they will do what
they felt bad about not doing last Christmas--spoiling the heck out of
the grandkids. Throughout this recession the toymaker Hasbro
(
HAS -
news
-
people
) (HAS, 27)
kept the growth up with its endless stream of household names like G.I.
Joe, Nerf balls, Play-Doh, Playskool, Transformers and Tonka. It's a
classic consumer discretionary stock at a time when consumer
discretionary stocks should lead the market. It's cheap at 13 times
2009 earnings and 1.1 times revenue. The yield is 2.9%.
Joined: 17/Jan/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 642
Posted: 04/Dec/2009 at 7:34pm
The Old Normal
Ken Fisher,
11.29.09
A decade ahead of lackluster earnings and economic growth? Don't believe that rubbish.
I can't call on my institutional clients without hearing anguished
questions about the "new normal." In case you have been fishing in the
upper Amazon basin, the "new normal" is Pimco's way of declaring that
the decade ahead will be lackluster. The slogan has taken on a life of
its own and been widely adopted. It's also utter nonsense--rubbish of
the first caliber.
The basic notion is that all the new
insurmountable problems we now face (deficits, unemployment, exhausted
consumers) will keep us in a dismal economy and poor stock market for
ten years. But to me it seems pretty clear that we are now experiencing
the same old normal we've always seen.
In my 37 years in the investment industry I've never, ever seen an
early bull market without some version of this theme that was widely
embraced. Last time around, in 2003-04, it was "a new era of lower
expectations." Then stocks rose for four years.
As a rule, the
bigger and scarier bear markets have been, the bigger the floodgates
have opened toward this sentiment--this view that the new problems are
just too big and bad to overcome. It all reminds me inherently and
eerily of Sir John Templeton's line that the four most dangerous words
in the English language are "This time it's different." It's different
in details, maybe, but the fundamental principles of investing don't
change.
Not to impugn Pimco's integrity (which I consider the
highest), but this view is convenient for that firm. Its business is
mainly in fixed income. As the economy strengthens--whether a little or
a lot--it is likely that long-term interest rates will rise. That will
make Pimco's bond portfolios go down in value. There's not much that
bond managers can do in a long bear market for bonds and still look
smart. If they go to cash, even with excellent timing, they get no big
hero's reward of the sort equity managers can get.
Take note: Pimco, a division of Allianz
(
AZ -
news
-
people
), is getting into the equity business right now. Watch what its managers do, not what they say.
While
obviously far from March's lows, stocks (globally) are still very cheap
by historical standards. They are also cheap compared with bonds. Be
bullish. Skip the biggest U.S. banks. Focus instead on materials,
industrials and technology. More important, invest heavily overseas,
where opportunities are the best. Here are some companies you should be
looking at.
AustralianAlumina Ltd.
(
AWC -
news
-
people
)(AWC, 6.2) doesn't
seem cheap at 27 times likely 2009 earnings. But those earnings are
depressed by the recession. This firm is one of the world's lowest-cost
producers of bauxite (aluminum ore) and refined bauxite (alumina), via
its 40% stake in Alcoa
(
AA -
news
-
people
)
World Alumina & Chemicals. As China keeps adding higher-cost
capacity for bauxite and alumina, Alumina becomes relatively lower cost
still. Earnings will roar back with the economy and then some. The
stock sells at 70% of book value and has a 5.1% dividend yield.
I recommended Braskem(BAK, 13)
at 4.5 in my Apr. 27 column. It's still a buy at today's higher price.
As Brazil's leading petrochemical firm, Braskem has at least several
exciting years ahead from Brazil's internal growth and from its ability
to sell throughout South America. In this hemisphere only Dow Chemical
(
DOW -
news
-
people
) and ExxonMobil
(
XOM -
news
-
people
)
are larger. The missing profits will return with the expansion. Even
now it sells at only 40% of annual revenue. Someday it should sell for
three times that and on higher revenue.
The economy is propelling
semiconductor sales forward, making chip outsourcing ever more viable.
A great stock for that is China's Semiconductor Manufacturing International
(
SMI -
news
-
people
)(SMI, 3.20),
China's largest silicon-wafer fabricator. It has scarcely $1 billion in
annual sales but should grow rapidly. It loses money now but has a
strong balance sheet and sells at only 60% of book value and 1.2 times
sales.
Emcor Group (EME, 26) is in an ugly field: industrial
construction and services like electrical installation and heating and
air-conditioning for commercial, industrial and government customers
(in America, no less). Still, it does relatively well from its base in
Norwalk, Conn. It sells at only 13 times the forecast for depressed
2009 earnings and at 30% of annual revenue. At this price you are
paying maybe 4 times 2011 earnings.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum