Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Equity Valuation Techniques
 The Equity Desk Forum :Market Strategies :Equity Valuation Techniques
Message Icon Topic: Pitfalls of investing in a high PE stock. Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 3 Next >>
Author Message
tigershark
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 13/Oct/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3542
Quote tigershark Replybullet Posted: 08/Nov/2007 at 1:22pm
tarkeshwar, PE  is not the criteria, your ability tp predict whether eps will continue to expand and at what rate or will eps start shrinking is what determines generally an investment descision.so in context to infy for the last oneyear people have been shouting that the dollar is doomed, that us economy is slowing down, that rupee is in a long term secular bull mkt, now in such an economic senario what are the chances that infy eps will continue to expand ata rate that it was expanding and what are the chances that eps will contract?when more poeple think its the latter it does not take long for pe derating to take place,astage will be reached when this pessimism reaches the other extreme there lies the oportunity for the contrarian, mypersonal view is that that day is still a long way off     ASOFTWARE CO LETS SAY TRADING ATA PE OF5 AND EXPORTINGTO THE USA IS OBIVIOUSLY NOT THE BEST BUSINESS TO BE IN.

Edited by tigershark - 08/Nov/2007 at 1:27pm
understanding both the power of compound return and the difficulty getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things
IP IP Logged
tarkeshwar
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 14/Oct/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Quote tarkeshwar Replybullet Posted: 08/Nov/2007 at 1:48pm
No opinion or expertise on China market. The odd figures do surprise when looked back, but I refuse to believe that these are all new times. The sentiments change quite suddenly and without reasons

 I think pe ratio does affect investing psyche at individual level too. The central qus is will you be able to hold a high pe stock and maybe even buy more, if it starts falling (possibly with general market) for no change in its fundamentals. I find more confidence with holding low pe stock in such cases than high pe ones other things being same. May differ from person to person. Take example of RPL (with an infinite pe :) rightnow and see how sentiments are changing on various announcements.

 Point is that high pe, high peg stocks fall harder when the fail to meet expectations. That is bound to happen sometime for sure, given that high rate growth is not sustainable.



Edited by tarkeshwar - 27/Nov/2007 at 1:11pm
IP IP Logged
tarkeshwar
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 14/Oct/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Quote tarkeshwar Replybullet Posted: 08/Nov/2007 at 2:00pm
Just a general comment - Most of the current software companies in India are just making use of the arbitrage opportunity arising out of the differential between salaries in India and USA. I don't see companies here innovating or building products. As with any arbitrage opportunity, the differential is going to shrink over time, whether it happens through competition (among Indian companies or from other countries), rising rupee, slowdown in US or increase in salaries in India. This is bound to happen.
IP IP Logged
MPD05
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 31/Oct/2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 140
Quote MPD05 Replybullet Posted: 08/Nov/2007 at 6:28pm
Very interesting discussion.

My own take is that PE can't be evaluated in isolation.  It has to be viewed in conjunction with future growth rate and revenue visibility.  As Basantji has suggested, PEG ratio is a useful indicator that I myself have used frequently.  I remember buying Infy at PEs of 50to 100 (ten years ago) but then it was consitently posting 20 - 25% QOQ growth.  Or think of Bharti Airtel or FT a few years ago.
Another point to remember while looking at PE is that it does not work well in case of companies that have several distinct businesses.  In such cases, I prefer to use sum of parts value analysis instead of looking at the PE.  RCAP, MAX, ABN, RIL, PRIL...none of these companies can be analysed just looking at the PE!

An absolute PE criterion works well in case of relatively homogeneous businesses, going through a steady growth phase ( as opposed to super growth).

One last point.  Yes, I agree that buying a high PE stock exposes one to the risk that the implied high growth might not happen.  However, how is that different from buying a "deep value" stock but the implied value unlocking triggers not materializing?  Some thing to ponder over!


Edited by MPD05 - 08/Nov/2007 at 6:29pm
IP IP Logged
smartcat
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 29/Mar/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4243
Quote smartcat Replybullet Posted: 08/Nov/2007 at 6:48pm
Technically, you should be able to value almost all stocks on P/E basis. But you should have the divine ability to estimate the future earnings. For example -  RPL is trading at a FY10e P/E of 16, RIL is trading at FY11e of 10 etc.
 
Even if a company has several distinct businesses like RCap or ABN or PRIL, at the end of the day, those businesses are going to generate 'earnings' - otherwise it has no real value. That's why I let the real experts figure out the SOTP value - I simply look at the estimated earnings and how they arrived at those numbers!
IP IP Logged
leo2007
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 22/Jul/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 262
Quote leo2007 Replybullet Posted: 25/Sep/2010 at 10:32am
IP IP Logged
manish_okhade
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20/Oct/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1997
Quote manish_okhade Replybullet Posted: 26/Sep/2010 at 12:15pm
If one is interested in investing for high growth PE stocks then one should:
 
1) must buy a portfolio not a standalone company. It helps to spread out the risk(read speculation for forcasting future growth)
2)Portfolio size should not big, risk spread is handled on the assumtipn that out of 10 stocks 2-3 will give strong results and compensate losses from remaining
3) Selection of companies should be based on businesses which looks scalable as well as uses franchise model
4) MCap is also to be checked for portfolio, they should show the hope for expansion with reasonable estimates
4) Growth rate should not be more than RoE
5) Hold portfolio for min 3-4 years
6) Recheck the story periodically
 
Above is the summary of Basantji's approach for justifying to buy high PE stocks. Argument is that high PE is definitly risky but above strategy has worked for him in the past so conviction is an individual matter.
IP IP Logged
manish_okhade
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20/Oct/2008
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1997
Quote manish_okhade Replybullet Posted: 26/Sep/2010 at 12:27pm
Originally posted by tarkeshwar

Just a general comment - Most of the current software companies in India are just making use of the arbitrage opportunity arising out of the differential between salaries in India and USA. I don't see companies here innovating or building products. As with any arbitrage opportunity, the differential is going to shrink over time, whether it happens through competition (among Indian companies or from other countries), rising rupee, slowdown in US or increase in salaries in India. This is bound to happen.
 
Here is my observation on this comment:
 
1) IT story is started by few firstcomers and they noted significant growth in initial phase due to cheap talaent availability and cost arbitrage
2)In 2nd phase, many others noticed this phenomenon and strted opening their own shops thus competitions comes into picture.
3) In 3rd phase competition led to salary hikes for talent poaching and salaries are still lower than US but reducing the cost arbitrage.
 
Now IT space is crowded and lost the purchasing power due to competition. All players can not continue to pay high salary and at the same time demand higher billing rates from customer. This will eventually lead to consolidation or many small players will be wiped out from the market. All big players have enough cash to buy small players and buying opportunity is good for them because it comes with new customer base.
 
Second possibility is the migration of work to new geos where cost arbitrage is still better than india but i am seeing there are issues like availability of abundant talent, process awareness etc. Hence above 1st possibility is very likely.
 
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 3 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.015 seconds.
Bookmark this Page