Author |
Message |
9StockPortfolio
Senior Member
Joined: 10/Sep/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 479
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 2:23pm |
Buffet says "Appropriate Discount rate". what is Appropriate depends upon individual. Bigger the Discount rate, lower the Intrinsic value, lower the buy price. So it's very important to select appropriate discount rate.
|
Pursuit of Value
|
IP Logged |
|
|
 |
|
basant
Admin Group
Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 2:30pm |
Take Cost of capital as 11%(Risk free rate + Premium). Now this is debatable because finding the beta for every stock is not easy so tale a 11% or thereabout number!
|
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
|
IP Logged |
|
|
9StockPortfolio
Senior Member
Joined: 10/Sep/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 479
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 2:36pm |
Originally posted by basant
Take Cost of capital as 11%(Risk free rate + Premium). Now this is debatable because finding the beta for every stock is not easy so tale a 11% or thereabout number! |
That's right Basant ji. Your argument seems perfect. unfortunately i do not understand Risk free rates & premiums, so i take Highest Inflation number as IRR. My returns should not be eaten by Inflation. So I consider 12% better than anything else.
|
Pursuit of Value
|
IP Logged |
|
|
basant
Admin Group
Joined: 01/Jan/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18403
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 3:16pm |
Yes, 12% is good as it gives some margin but the problem in cash flow is not in the COC but in estimating the actual cash flow in Year X!
|
'The Thoughtful Investor: A Journey to Financial Freedom Through Stock Market Investing' - A Book on Equity Investing especially for Indian Investors. Book your copy now: www.thethoughtfulinvestor.in
|
IP Logged |
|
|
kannanravi1
Senior Member
Joined: 08/May/2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 609
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 7:49pm |
Hi Kishore, Here's my personal opinion on Intrinsic value calc. As Basantji rightly said, it is future FCF discounted to present. I agree that it is typically difficult to project cap ex into the future. But this is quite possible when one knows a company intimately enough. I don't have that much knowledge about any individual company yet, bt feel that I have a reasonable handle on projecting capex for some of oldest holdings. For new investments I typically just use the ROE % to project future earnings. ROE typically acts as a conservative figure for companies that have low or zero debt at present. If they want to grow faster than ROE then they can pile on debt. So, to start with I pick companies with low or zero debt and then project using ROE for my new investments. Since there is possibility of higher error in these simple projections, I apply atleast a 30% margin of error to my intrinsic value calcs. Though I calculate growth based on ROE, I also calculate an intrinsic value assuming zero growth. I then try to wait for companies to reach this zero growth number. It is usually not easy to get companies at zero growth number, but crashes like the one we just experienced typically get these companies close to that number. I must confess though that sometimes I get tempted or tired of the wait and jump in when the prices reach the ROE based intrinsic value:)
For rate of return I usually take 8-10% depending on the interest rate scenario. I have gone up to 12% when bank FDs where giving around 12% about a year back. My theory is to get a return that is atleast equal to FD return. Since I typically wait for the 'almost zero growth' intrinsic value situation till I invest, I have consistently and easily bet FD return rates by a good margin. But still I like to be very very conservative in my new investments. Plus, I must add that I usually invest in good dividend yiled stocks, and dividends add more cream to my 'returns' cake:).
Hope this helps.
|
kannan
|
IP Logged |
|
|
subu76
Senior Member
Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 8:02pm |
While RJ also talks about value, ROE etc...i wonder if he took these into considerations while buying Crisil, Titan, Pantaloon when he did. Those seem more like macro calls.
|
IP Logged |
|
|
kannanravi1
Senior Member
Joined: 08/May/2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 609
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 8:07pm |
Hi Subu, Good point. My gut feel too is that they are macro calls. But I guess RJ has had a history of success on macro calls. He apparently also has friends 'at the right places' (read inside) to give him a better feel for company, sector etc. Does anyone know at what average P/Es did RJ acquire CRISIL, Titan etc at?
|
kannan
|
IP Logged |
|
|
subu76
Senior Member
Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
|
 Posted: 27/Apr/2009 at 8:12pm |
It's true RJ's style is hard to practise. And also the idea of investing in a bunch of different stocks with probabilities of hits.
Sorry, if i diverted the discussion on this thread. I'll try to find the data and post it on the RJ thread.
|
IP Logged |
|
|