Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Suggestions / Feedback
 The Equity Desk Forum :Welcome- Have you registered on our mailing list? :Suggestions / Feedback
Message Icon Topic: LK Advani for PM ??? Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 33 Next >>
Author Message
BGKGURU
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 28/Nov/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 635
Quote BGKGURU Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 2:33pm
ECONOMY+INFLATION+DIVESTMENT +ROAD CONSTRUNCTION ETEC..... ARE OUR ISSUE. I THINK YOUR ISSUE IS ONLY RAM+LEFT+FOREIGNER. fOR YOUR INFO. RAHUL ALREADY MARRIED WITH ONE FOREIGNER.
 
My girlfriend is Spanish: Rahul Gandhi
 
Vrinda Gopinath
 
Amethi, April 28,2004: Rahul Gandhi may have just got himself a new job. The fifth-generation heir of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty is all set to become a parliamentarian from Amethi and the excitement and anxiety is palpable.

Campaigning is over, the day of reckoning has come. However, Rahul would like the world to believe he is only serving his dharma. "I don’t care if I win or lose this election," he says, sitting in his garden, as rain clouds gather over Amethi.

"I am here as a sensible, responsible Indian, because I want to help people get on track, from being distracted by dangerous issues like religious and caste hatred."

But is he surprised at the Rahul effect.

"Obviously something is very wrong if a 33-year-old can just pop up and get this kind of attention. If the BJP had done well, I would not have got this response."

While Rahul launches into a soliloquy on trade and economics (like "wherever we’ve succeeded is despite the Government"), guess which industry Rahul is looking to revive? Following in the footprints of his father and uncle, it is none other than the automobile industry. "It is where a lot of jobs lie," he says.

He says he has learnt his lessons of humility from the working class ethics of England. "I could have joined politics soon after my father died," explains Rahul, "but I was just 19 and had nothing to offer. I made a commitment to myself, I will do it one day. After studies in the US, I risked my life to do away with my guards to lead a regular life in England...I worked for five years. I’m glad I did it."

Now that he has rejected the regular job, regular life, what happens to his regular gal? "My girlfriend’s name is Veronique not Juanita," laughs Rahul, "She is Spanish and not Venezuelan or Colombian. She is an architect not a waitress, though I wouldn’t have had a problem with that. She is also my best friend." He met her in his university in England.

Has he already proposed to her? "Hmm", he answers with a huge smile, "I am not sure when I will be settling down." Would he not be breaking many hearts here? "I hope not a lot of hearts," he grins, "You cannot make everyone happy."

 


Edited by BGKGURU - 19/Apr/2009 at 11:22pm
Respect the Markets and do MAKE mistakes, but see to it that you can afford to stay in the markets even after the mistake-RJ
IP IP Logged
chic_1978
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 10/Aug/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
Quote chic_1978 Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 3:43pm

FOR ALL THE DIE HARD FANS OF GANDHI FAMILY....CHECK THIS OUT

 

INTERESTING HISTORY!

At the very beginning of his book, "The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K.N.Rao mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather.

Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru.  

And we all know that Jawaharlal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.

She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze.   

Why? No one tells us that!

Now, who is this Feroze?

We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer.

The grocer supplied wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan (previously known as Ishrat Manzil)

What was the family grocer's name?

One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru.

But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers.

In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies.

Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name?

It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.

This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.

This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived.

Rajiv's father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.

Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.

 

The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself,

while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex;

the mother was in hospital.

Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.

Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (better known as Mahatma Gandhi).

Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance.

It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit.  And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi.

The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'Why?

When they returned to India, amock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption.

On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime Private Secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI! ) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942.  An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage."

It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced.

 

Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan.

Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.  

Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze.

He was the son of another Muslim gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.

 

Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name.

It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car.

Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.

Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of mythological Lord Indra's Court dancer rather offensive !!)   took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi.

 

And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either.

Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay.

 

It was then that her father,Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick.

Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka.

Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.

 

It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident.

In Yunus's book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis.

 

It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal freedom.

 

Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was?

 

When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.

Nehru was no less a player in producing b*****ds.

 

At least one case is very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the NehruAge", page 206.

 

Mathai writes:

"In the autumn of 1948 a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology.  People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful.  Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent, mostly after he finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply and she visited Nehru at midnight...“

 

Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared

In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself.

 

She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind.

 

She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister.

 

The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his hereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive.

Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was."

Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi,

we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.  

 

Rajiv became Roberto.

His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul.

 

Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul.

 

What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters.

 

The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after  taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he  was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.


Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all.

His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.

 

It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven.

The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today!

 

The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at  that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had therefore to  leave Cambridge without a certificate.

Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the University of Cambridge , but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time.

 

And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India's public.

This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now a foreigner leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification being married into the Nehru family.

Maneka Gandhi, though Indian, herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.

Saying that an Italian (or any foreigner) should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (now Sonia) had served India like, say, Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.

OR

Saying that any other party which comes to rule India is better is again equally worse. 

 

The point is Indians who nominate the people to stand in these elections; and the people who vote their rulers (i.e. the authorities) must know that truth eventually come out some day. 

 

Dont allow the famous land of India  (our motherland) to be looked down by others.

 

happy & wise investing
IP IP Logged
stockaddict
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18/Jul/2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 263
Quote stockaddict Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 3:48pm
I don't care about who advani or Rahul gandhi is married to ......i only care for whether they can deliver as politicians. I have no identity crisis like the BJP leaders have.Advani is Sindhi (of Pak origin BTW)Tongue
IP IP Logged
deveshkayal
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 04/Sep/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3903
Quote deveshkayal Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 6:02pm
I lost my respect for Narendra Modi when he backed out of Karan Thapar's show "Devil Advocate" after just 1 question. I dont call such person "A Leader". Also, he started playing politics during the 26/11 by announcing rewards for the senior police officials while the operations between army and terrorists were going on. Fortunately the wife of the senior police official rejected his reward Clap. He said recently," It was a shame on our country by not providing security to IPL during elections". Congress gave an excellent reply by showing the letter of Gujarat's DGP who clearly insisted not holding matches during elections.

As for tax exemptions upto 3.5 lakh, then get ready for FISCAL DEFICIT of 20% in this environment.

I have no regards for BJP whatsoever and I am happy that exit polls are indicating that UPA with coalition will be back to power. I admire ManMohan Singh who started the liberalisation in 1992 and PC for whatever they have done for the country.

I believe CONGRESS is BETTER placed than BJP. One should read some intelligent people's blog (For example: Amit Verma's India Uncut)
"You don't need to be a rocket scientist. Investing is not a game where the guy with the 160 IQ beat the guy with a 130 IQ. Rationality is essential"- Warren Buffett
IP IP Logged
paragdesai
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 22/Oct/2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 837
Quote paragdesai Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 6:32pm
Deveshji,

I am fully agree to your observation regarding 26/11 incident & even I am not a die hard supporter of his all actions but what I feel & want to say is his capacity as a strong administrator. Due to unwarranted harsh language speeches his other qualities are not debated.
At the moment people either hate NM or love NM. There are very few who are in between.

Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity ....
IP IP Logged
manishdave
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 05/Aug/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1371
Quote manishdave Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 6:50pm
Originally posted by deveshkayal


As for tax exemptions upto 3.5 lakh, then get ready for FISCAL DEFICIT of 20% in this environment.

I admire ManMohan Singh who started the liberalisation in 1992 and PC for whatever they have done for the country.

You are entitled to your opinion like everybody but atleast get your facts right.
 
You are active investor in stock so may be someday you will understand who is capitalist and who is socialist.
 
Originally posted by deveshkayal


I admire ManMohan Singh who started the liberalisation in 1992 and PC for whatever they have done for the country.
 
What MMS did was directed by IMF and that was compulsion. Now we don't have compulson so they are doing NREGA(read: big scam) and loan waiver. They stopped privatization, slowed down road projects, infra projects. And they have started talking abt reservation in private sector. Hight of liberalisation!!! Have you ever though of nightmare business ppl have abt reservation? If Govt starts telling IBM whom to hire and whom to not, IBM and many more will vote with their feet.
IP IP Logged
Vivek Sukhani
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23/Jul/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6675
Quote Vivek Sukhani Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 7:42pm
Originally posted by deveshkayal

I lost my respect for Narendra Modi when he backed out of Karan Thapar's show "Devil Advocate" after just 1 question. I dont call such person "A Leader". Also, he started playing politics during the 26/11 by announcing rewards for the senior police officials while the operations between army and terrorists were going on. Fortunately the wife of the senior police official rejected his reward Clap. He said recently," It was a shame on our country by not providing security to IPL during elections". Congress gave an excellent reply by showing the letter of Gujarat's DGP who clearly insisted not holding matches during elections.

As for tax exemptions upto 3.5 lakh, then get ready for FISCAL DEFICIT of 20% in this environment.

I have no regards for BJP whatsoever and I am happy that exit polls are indicating that UPA with coalition will be back to power. I admire ManMohan Singh who started the liberalisation in 1992 and PC for whatever they have done for the country.

I believe CONGRESS is BETTER placed than BJP. One should read some intelligent people's blog (For example: Amit Verma's India Uncut)
 
We have many reason to lose respect for MMS. Look at what team he was carrying in his cabinet. Look at the quality of ministers, especially from his ally, RJD's stable( or gaushala)!!!!!
 
By the way, what right did he do in the last 5 years. He was always at the mercy of someone......be it left, be it SP, or be it Mayawati, or be it the Madame!!!!!
Jai Guru!!!
IP IP Logged
catcall
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/Sep/2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1076
Quote catcall Replybullet Posted: 16/Apr/2009 at 8:53pm
  Manmohan singh reminds me of the Jagjit Singh Shayari:
 
Rukh hava ka jidhar ka , udhar ke ham hain!
 
 The guy cannot even win a election on his own.. in a democracy to have a PM who does not have a popular mandate just does not seem correct to me....
My first choice would be Narendra Modi and second LKA


Edited by catcall - 16/Apr/2009 at 9:07pm
There are two times in a man's life when he should not speculate-when he can't afford it and when he can-Happy investing!
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 33 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.016 seconds.
Bookmark this Page