Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin

Stock Synopsis
 The Equity Desk Forum :Investment Ideas - Creating winning portfolios! :Stock Synopsis
Message Icon Topic: Goodricke- can it be really good? Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 11 Next >>
Author Message
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 23/Jun/2010 at 1:26am
Originally posted by Vivek Sukhani

........But can you therefore hypothesize that Energy stocks will continue to rise for a long time at varying rates and with varying fluctuations?
 
Stocks( I mean stock prices) dont map the commodities in entirety. The direction may be identical in most of the cases but magnitude is not. Tell me, Jayshree Tea and Mcleod fell 40 p.c from their peak, but have tea prices fallen 40 p.c.???Similarly, from the bottom these stocks rose almost 8 times, but did tea prices rise 8 times?
 
That again makes me go to the first point I mentioned.....look for good business at cheap enough entry rates. And dont forget, tea prices dont have too much of a speculative element....therefore chances of it falling like a rock is very remote, until and unless it shoots up like a rocket first.
 
Also, I dont know whether one should look at tea like a necessity or a luxury....but if you do take it as a necessity, these stocks wont falter in the long run.
 
 
 
Thanks a lot Vivek....Your points are extremely helpful
IP IP Logged
Vivek Sukhani
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23/Jul/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6675
Quote Vivek Sukhani Replybullet Posted: 23/Jun/2010 at 7:43am
Originally posted by excel_monkey

Vivek
would you prefer Goodricke over Jayshree?
 
Between them I would always prefer Goodricke.
 
The first use of cash from operations is to re-inforce the balance sheet. Use it for fixed asset acquisition, use it for debt repayment, use it for dividend, but dont use it to go into new businesses.
 
Infact, the best company in this space would be Mcleod. It does see lot of speculation though.....but this is very aggressive. They had the guts to acquire gardens, merge other tea companies during nt so good times, and now they are reaping the fruits.
Jai Guru!!!
IP IP Logged
excel_monkey
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 17/Nov/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1281
Quote excel_monkey Replybullet Posted: 24/Jun/2010 at 9:11pm
Vivek
I think Nirma is a company which is cold and would be on the burner soon
Quoting at an attractive price to cash earnings ratio of 5
Great brands and other good productive assets

Originally posted by Vivek Sukhani

In a country like ours, nothing stays in demand-supply match for long....so I guess we cannot ever think long-term thinking along those lines 'alone'.
 

The stocks which will give you the most incredible returns will be the ones who you discover cheap and who has a feature of regular consumption( that may or may not grow, but most importantly, it shouldnt decline). Now, to obtain great returns, we not have to only meet the second condition, but we have to meet the first condition as well.

 

I think the concern talked about by Hit makes a great sense. We have to concerned about standalone garden companies and focus on companies which have a wider geographical plantation base.

 

Just think about it.....at a time when we are paying 5-10 times turnover for FMCG companies, we are not paying one time turnover for Goodricke. What we are ignoring is that the balance sheet is in the best shape in the last 10 years.....Just think, we are paying for consumer companies in big big multiples to their book values, we are trying to get them at sub-2 p.c. dividend yield then why not consider stocks which hav the feature of regular consumption of their finished goods, but not perceived as fast moving available at pretty decent fundamentals.

 

Consumer companies can also be rank under-performers.....there's no consumer company in India having a bigger basket of brands than HUL. But track its performance over the last 10 years.

 

What looks great at the moment may turn out to be pretty dud. Nothing is predictable beyond a point....we cannot figure out competition with accuracy, we cannot figure about demographics with accuracy, we cannot figure about technological change with accuracy. Nothing in stock markets remain hot for ever, and nothing remains cold for ever. What you try to do is avoid getting into the hottest stocks ready to be placed into the refrigerator and not avoiding the coldest stocks just placed on the burner.
IP IP Logged
Vivek Sukhani
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23/Jul/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6675
Quote Vivek Sukhani Replybullet Posted: 26/Jun/2010 at 8:49am
Nirma should be okay, but am not so sure about how great would be the investment in this company.
 
They have gone into way too many businesses, some of which are allied and some unallied to their cash generating business of detergents and soaps. I am also holding a few tickets of Nirma, and am not in any hurry to sell them, but am not finding it exciting enough to load up more.
 
But one thing I must say is that companies should continually invest in strengthening their main business if there is scope. Just look at ITC....while HUL is busy in monetising its assets, it is acquiring assets and building up facilities and capacities in practically all of its business. HUL is finding no better use of cash but to do nominal buybacks, ITC is using it to spur future growth. I am going through ITC's Annual Report for 2009-2010 and I am experiencing a greater sense of investor delight as I turn pages.
 
Nirma also has added capacities, but its marketing effort has become pretty ordinary. As a shareholder I would like to for companies which takes on competitors and turns the heat on them. Nirma fails in that. Its a value for sure, their American acquiition of trona mines should hold them in good stead. But I want them to hit HUL with force. PnG( unlisted arom of PnG) is walking away with the kill, and Nirma, it seems is remaining a mute spectator to this. If PnG is going all guns blazing to kill Surf and Rin, Nirma should try to do the same to Wheel.
 
Fincials-wise, I am unable to locate a cheaper FMCG company that Nirma. And thats why I would stick with it. But Nirma shouldnt just stop at that....
Jai Guru!!!
IP IP Logged
excel_monkey
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 17/Nov/2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1281
Quote excel_monkey Replybullet Posted: 27/Jun/2010 at 3:22pm
Originally posted by Vivek Sukhani

Nirma should be okay, but am not so sure about how great would be the investment in this company.
 

They have gone into way too many businesses, some of which are allied and some unallied to their cash generating business of detergents and soaps. I am also holding a few tickets of Nirma, and am not in any hurry to sell them, but am not finding it exciting enough to load up more.

 

But one thing I must say is that companies should continually invest in strengthening their main business if there is scope. Just look at ITC....while HUL is busy in monetising its assets, it is acquiring assets and building up facilities and capacities in practically all of its business. HUL is finding no better use of cash but to do nominal buybacks, ITC is using it to spur future growth. I am going through ITC's Annual Report for 2009-2010 and I am experiencing a greater sense of investor delight as I turn pages.

 

Nirma also has added capacities, but its marketing effort has become pretty ordinary. As a shareholder I would like to for companies which takes on competitors and turns the heat on them. Nirma fails in that. Its a value for sure, their American acquiition of trona mines should hold them in good stead. But I want them to hit HUL with force. PnG( unlisted arom of PnG) is walking away with the kill, and Nirma, it seems is remaining a mute spectator to this. If PnG is going all guns blazing to kill Surf and Rin, Nirma should try to do the same to Wheel.

 

Fincials-wise, I am unable to locate a cheaper FMCG company that Nirma. And thats why I would stick with it. But Nirma shouldnt just stop at that....


true
the same old Karsanbahi magic is missing
as well as they have become more of a commodity company as a result of acquisitions
but still all the business (commodity of otherwise) of the company are globally competitive and in fact some are cost leaders
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 27/Jun/2010 at 11:13pm
Nirma's ads also lack the flair of old time...it also seems to be a misfit in beauty soaps category with their chubby new model
IP IP Logged
subu76
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25/Feb/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5709
Quote subu76 Replybullet Posted: 27/Jun/2010 at 11:14pm

Not sure if we have discussed this before:

One important negative for Goodricke is the presence of sister concerns in the same area. Who knows what bouncer this company can throw at any point of time.
 
 
All negatives said and done...the stock price does seem extremely cheap .....
 
Strangely it never made any money for folks who bought this one when the thread started though the picture is a lot better now.......


Edited by subu76 - 27/Jun/2010 at 11:18pm
IP IP Logged
Vivek Sukhani
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23/Jul/2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6675
Quote Vivek Sukhani Replybullet Posted: 27/Jun/2010 at 9:55am
Originally posted by subu76

Not sure if we have discussed this before:

One important negative for Goodricke is the presence of sister concerns in the same area. Who knows what bouncer this company can throw at any point of time.
 
 
All negatives said and done...the stock price does seem extremely cheap .....
 
Strangely it never made any money for folks who bought this one when the thread started though the picture is a lot better now.......
Well, my average acquisition price would be nearly 50-55 rupees and I sold almost a third of my holding between 112-174. So, I guess I am still quite deep in money, even though the price may not be as attractive as when it was 190+.
 
As far as your doubts go, these are the sterling companies, into existence for a very long while. Its too sleepy a company to make all those smart moves to transfer estates from one company to another.
Jai Guru!!!
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 11 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.033 seconds.
Bookmark this Page